ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Modulating somatosensory alpha oscillations using short-period transcranial alternating current stimulation.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) appears to modulate neuronal oscillations at the frequency of stimulation. Longer periods of stimulation with tACS (10-40 min) have shown to produce persistent changes, especially in alpha power (~8-12 Hz), whereas the efficacy of shorter periods of tACS (1-8 s) is less known. Thus, we investigated whether short periods of tACS applied to the somatosensory cortex elicit changes in alpha power following stimulation. With this aim, during simultaneous acquisition of MEG, we administered tACS and control (no-tACS) on separate days. We applied short trains of stimulation for durations of 10 s and 30 s at an individually adapted stimulation frequency (ISF). Each stimulation train was followed by a 15 s interval. We calculated power changes in the post-stimulation intervals, relative to a baseline period, and the resulting Δpower was used to statistically test the difference between tACS and control conditions. We found significant elevations in power at ISF following tACS compared with control. The extent of this effect spanned bilaterally over the somatosensory and frontal regions. While the observed increase in power was most prominent around ISF (i.e., in the alpha band), power modulations were also observed in the beta-band. When comparing the two stimulation durations, 10 s of tACS produced greater increases in power (at ISF) than 30 s of tACS. This study validates that 10 s of tACS produces robust elevations of power in the somatosensory cortex at ISF, thereby establishing its potential for use in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.