ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Neural correlates of foreign speech imitation: The effects of age and music.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult learners of a foreign speech are often marked by having a foreign accent; however, children and adults with singing training tend to have better pronunciations than adults without music training. The assimilation hypothesis proposes that people tend to assimilate foreign speech to native speech during perception and production, which may explain foreign accent. Unfortunately, the neural mechanisms underlying the age and music effects are still unclear. In this study, we compared brain activation patterns in three groups of participants, namely, children, adults with singing training, and adults without music training (control adults) during native (Chinese) and foreign speech (Spanish) imitation with each word repeated three times. We found greater representational similarity between Chinese and Spanish in both groups of adults than in children during both speech perception and production, supporting the assimilation hypothesis. Furthermore, we found group-specific effects for the similarity between different times of imitation, suggesting different mechanisms. Specifically, control adults showed greater similarity between different times of Spanish word imitation than the other two groups in the medial orbital frontal cortex involved in adaptive learning/memory; children showed greater similarity than the other two groups in the bilateral inferior premotor/postcentral gyri involved in sensorimotor learning; adults with singing training showed greater similarity than the other two groups in the left superior temporal gyrus involved in auditory feedback. It suggests that singing training facilitates reliance on auditory discrimination, while children rely on somatosensory and speech motor control to learn foreign speech sounds, implicating different mechanisms of age and singing training effects. Our results provide insights in understanding the neural mechanisms of age and music effects in foreign speech learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.