ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Brain-wide associations of reaction time variability in the ABCD study.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intra-individual variability in reaction times (IIVRT), which generally occurs as a result of episodic long reaction times (RTs), is a marker for impaired attention. Multiple functional neuroimaging studies have attempted to discern neurofunctional correlates of IIVRT, but few use models that account for trial-level IIVRT. Neurofunctional correlates of IIVRT differ depending on the method applied, and few studies have used multiple methods in the same sample. This study utilized Stop-Signal Task functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from 8,066 children (9-10 years old) in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study. IIVRT was modeled using multiple methods, including converting RTs to z-scores, variance time course modeling, and a novel machine-learning technique (i.e., hidden Markov model) to compute the probability of a trial reflecting good or poor attentional states. Across all three methods, lower IIVRT was associated with greater activation in the default mode network (DMN), while higher IIRVT was associated with greater activation in the dorsal attention network (DAN). Although all models yielded similar neural correlates, z-score modeling demonstrated the strongest effect sizes in task-related networks. Our findings are congruent with previous work in adults and demonstrate the reproducibility and developmental stability of the neural correlates of trial-level IIVRT. Higher effect sizes for brain-IIVRT associations using the z-score method suggest that this approach is a simple and promising candidate for investigating neural mechanisms related to IIVRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.