ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Improving of 6 weeks of repeated sprint training on the aerobic and anaerobic power of college-age male rugby players.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-Intensity Exercise Performance as a Complex Adaptive System: An Integrative Review.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Associations of resting plasma adenosine triphosphate, antioxidant capacity, and oxidative stress biomarkers with cardiorespiratory fitness in combat sport athletes: a pilot cross-sectional study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Muay Thai-specific high-intensity interval training enhances anaerobic power in elite fighters.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Effect of six weeks of blood flow restriction combined with Tabata training on anaerobic capacity in male badminton players.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rugby is characterized by the necessity for athletes to engage in high-intensity efforts followed by rapid recovery phases. Effective training methodologies that enhance both aerobic and anaerobic capacities are crucial for peak athletic performance in this sport. Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a 6-week repeated sprint training (RST) program in enhancing the aerobic and anaerobic power of collegiate male rugby players, compared to high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Methods: Twenty-eight male collegiate rugby players were randomly assigned to one of two groups: repeated sprint training group (RSTG) or a high-intensity interval training group (HIITG). Aerobic power was assessed using the Yo-Yo IR1 Test and an incremental load gas metabolism test, while anaerobic power was measured through the Wingate Anaerobic Test. Assessments were conducted pre- and post-intervention. Results: All participants completed the study, and all data were included in the analysis. Mixed repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant main effects of time on the Yo-Yo IR1 test, VO Conclusion: The 6-week RST protocol was more effective than HIIT in improving key aerobic and anaerobic capacities in collegiate male rugby players. These findings advocate for the integration of RST into the training schedules of rugby players to optimally enhance performance-related physical attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.