ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
PCI for Chronic Total Occlusions with Distal Diffuse Disease: Stent Alone vs. Stent plus Drug Balloon.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blended Coronary Revascularization with Drug-Coated Balloon and Drug-Eluting Stent: A Narrative Review on Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Drug-coated balloon angioplasty for chronic total coronary occlusions. Blended strategies: the best of two worlds.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of coronary arteries is a significant challenge in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite successful revascularization, patients often develop diffuse coronary lesions, increasing the risk of restenosis and necessitating complex stent strategies. Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus DES-only treatment in patients with revascularized CTO and diffuse coronary artery disease. Methods: Patients with successfully revascularized CTO and diffuse lesions were divided into DES-only (n = 191) and DES plus DCB (n = 100) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, cardiac death, stroke, and revascularization. The secondary endpoint was the rate of cardiovascular-related hospitalization. Symptom improvement was evaluated using the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification. Results: At 24-month follow-up, the DES plus DCB group had significantly lower MACE incidence (26.00 % vs. 41.36 %, P = 0.008) and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (20.00 % vs. 36.65 %, P = 0.005) compared to the DES-only group. CCS classification improved more significantly in the DES plus DCB group (P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression identified DES plus DCB as an independent protective factor against MACE (HR, 0.57; 95 % CI, 0.33-0.99; P = 0.046). Conclusion: In patients with revascularized CTO and diffuse coronary artery disease, the combined DES plus DCB strategy was associated with a lower incidence of MACE and reduced cardiovascular-related hospitalization compared to DES-only treatment. This approach may represent a superior therapeutic option for managing complex coronary lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.