ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
A machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes after rapid response system activation.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Critique on Machine Learning Model for Predicting Short-Term Outcomes After Rapid Response System Activation.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
- A machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes after rapid response system activation.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Maintaining rapid response team (RRT) response quality is difficult. A system that supports RRT assessment could potentially contribute to medical safety. Although rapid response system (RRS) triggers have been well-studied, studies on the prediction models of short-term prognosis after RRS activation are scarce. We aimed to develop a model to predict short-term outcomes after RRS activation using machine learning. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the In-Hospital Emergency Registry in Japan, a multicentre RRS online registry. We collected data on patient demographics, treatment before RRS, RRT calls, and physiological parameters. The outcome was death within 24 h after RRS calls or unplanned transfers to an intensive care unit. To develop the eXtreme Gradient Boosted Tree Classifier (XGB) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms, a logistic regression (LR) algorithm was used. For model comparison, receiver-operating area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated and compared with those of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Results: 5414 cases were included in the study. The outcome occurred in 28.4% of the cases. The XGB model showed the highest AUC (0.798) compared to the RF model (0.796), LR model (0.785), NEWS (0.696), and MEWS (0.660). The most weighted feature in the XGB model was doctor activation, followed by hypotension as the activation criteria and usage of oxygen. Conclusions: We developed the first machine learning model for short-term prognosis after RRS. This model has the potential to support decision-making by RRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.