Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800661›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

A machine learning model for predicting short-term outcomes after rapid response system activation.

Takaki Naito, Micheal Li, Shigeki Fujitani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takaki NaitoEnterprise Analytics Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8333-0141
Micheal LiEnterprise Analytics Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0351-2637
Shigeki FujitaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki-shi Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6327-682X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Maintaining rapid response team (RRT) response quality is difficult. A system that supports RRT assessment could potentially contribute to medical safety. Although rapid response system (RRS) triggers have been well-studied, studies on the prediction models of short-term prognosis after RRS activation are scarce. We aimed to develop a model to predict short-term outcomes after RRS activation using machine learning. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the In-Hospital Emergency Registry in Japan, a multicentre RRS online registry. We collected data on patient demographics, treatment before RRS, RRT calls, and physiological parameters. The outcome was death within 24 h after RRS calls or unplanned transfers to an intensive care unit. To develop the eXtreme Gradient Boosted Tree Classifier (XGB) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms, a logistic regression (LR) algorithm was used. For model comparison, receiver-operating area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated and compared with those of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). Results: 5414 cases were included in the study. The outcome occurred in 28.4% of the cases. The XGB model showed the highest AUC (0.798) compared to the RF model (0.796), LR model (0.785), NEWS (0.696), and MEWS (0.660). The most weighted feature in the XGB model was doctor activation, followed by hypotension as the activation criteria and usage of oxygen. Conclusions: We developed the first machine learning model for short-term prognosis after RRS. This model has the potential to support decision-making by RRT.

Indexed as

early warning scoremachine learningmedical emergency teamrapid response system

Identifiers

PMID40800661
PMCPMC12340607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.