ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
A software pipeline for systematizing machine learning of speech data.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reproducibility and replicability of experimental findings is an essential element of the scientific process. The machine-learning community has a long-established practice of sharing data sets so that researchers can report the performance of their models on the same data. In the area of speech analysis, and more specifically speech of individuals with mental health and neurocognitive conditions, a number of such data sets exist and are the subject of organized "challenge tasks". However, as the complexity of the available relevant software libraries and their parameters increases, we argue that researchers should not only share their data but also their preprocessing and machine learning configurations so that their experiments may be fully reproduced. This is why we have designed and developed a suite of configurable software pipelines with Python Luigi for speech-data preprocessing, feature extraction, fold construction for cross-validation, machine learning training, and label prediction. These components rely on state-of-the-art software libraries, frequently used by researchers, and implement many typical tasks in this field, i.e., scikit-learn, openSMILE, LogMMSE, so that, given the configuration parameters of each task, any underlying experiments can be readily reproduced. We have evaluated our platform by replicating three different machine learning studies, with the aim of detecting depression, mild cognitive impairment, and aphasia from speech data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.