Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800622›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic & vision research2025

Acute-onset Concomitant Esotropia in Children: A Comparison of Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes.

Ying Wang, Jingjing Jiang, Li Li

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ying WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Jingjing JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
Li LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the clinical features and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection versus surgery in acute-onset concomitant esotropia (ACE) in children. Methods: This retrospective comparative clinical study was conducted on 40 children with ACE. The patients were assigned to either the surgery group ( Results: The average treatment age in this study was 7.02 Conclusion: In our study, type II was the most common clinical classification for ACE. Favorable outcomes could be achieved with both BTX-A injection and surgery. There was no difference in motor or sensory outcomes regardless of clinical classification. BTX-A injection is minimally invasive, allows early intervention, and may be the preferred approach for managing ACE in children.

Indexed as

Acute-onset Concomitant EsotropiaBotulinum Toxin ABurian's ClassificationsClinical FeaturesExtraocular Muscle Surgery

Identifiers

PMID40800622
PMCPMC12320468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.