ReviewInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025
Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review.
Review in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Nursing interventions to enhance self-care in heart failure: a systematic review interpreted through the COM-B model.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Self-Leadership and Caring as Foundations of Relational Accountability in Nursing Clinical Judgement: A Conceptual Analysis.Nursing open · 2026Review
- Bridging the gap between evidence-based guidelines and clinical practice excellence: The role of mentorship.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Digital alert fatigue and escalation behaviours in nurse-led remote postoperative care: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The relationship between nursing students' digital literacy and their levels of clinical decision-making.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality of nursing documentation and clinical reasoning competence: The mediating role of interprofessional collaboration.SAGE open medicine · 2026Article
- Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Review
- Impact of the HIRAID emergency nursing framework on nurse and patient outcomes: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proficiency in clinical reasoning is crucial for achieving positive patient outcomes in healthcare. Nurses should take an active role in fostering their clinical reasoning skills. Bedside support strategies aim to offer practical, invaluable, and easily applicable resources for restructuring cognitive processes in situations of complex clinical demands. Objective: This review aimed to map evidence on bedside decision strategies applied by nurses to support clinical reasoning. Methods: The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations for scoping reviews. Information: Sources Studies were retrieved from Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, RCAAP (Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), and Google Scholar. Studies published in Portuguese, English, Spanish, or Swedish, without imposing geographical or cultural restrictions were considered. Qualitative and quantitative studies on bedside decision strategies that support nursing clinical reasoning were included, while studies exclusively focused on education, case-specific content, or Artificial Intelligence applications were excluded. Results: Out of 1889 results, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted in countries such as China, New Zealand, Norway, Brazil, Indonesia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia, involving nurses, patients, and healthcare teams, with study designs ranging from qualitative research and cohort studies to quasi-experimental and theoretical analyses.These studies identified two key strategies: normative (following guidelines) and reflective (based on critical self-reflection). Conclusions: Reflective strategies are widely used at the bedside, emphasizing the importance of adaptability in uncertain clinical environments. Despite Artificial Intelligence's role in clinical decision-making, fostering critical thinking and decision-making skills in nurses remains essential. Registration: OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H96VQ. Tweetable abstract: A scoping review identified normative and reflective bedside strategies used by nurses to support clinical reasoning, highlighting the value of adaptability and critical thinking in complex care settings. #ClinicalReasoning #Nursing #PatientCare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.