Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800576›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025

Psychometric Evaluation and Cultural Adaptation of the Indonesian Version of the Knowledge About Schizophrenia Test (KAST) in Family Caregivers.

Tuti Kurnianingsih, Jin Young Chang, Irvan Afriandi, Veranita Pandia, Meita Dhamayanti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tuti KurnianingsihDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Jin Young ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-9635-7367
Irvan AfriandiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-0524
Veranita PandiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.
Meita DhamayantiDepartment of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9661-0708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The Knowledge about Schizophrenia Test (KAST) is a widely used instrument for assessing knowledge about schizophrenia. However, its applicability in diverse cultural contexts, such as Indonesia, necessitates validation due to potential variations in cultural beliefs and caregiving practices. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties and conduct a cultural adaptation of the Indonesian version of the KAST among family caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia in Indonesia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 94 family caregivers of schizophrenia patients from community settings. Item analysis, construct validity (using known-group comparison and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)), and internal consistency reliability were assessed. Results: Item analysis indicated acceptable discriminant power for most items, with Pearson correlation coefficients ≥0.3, except for item 17 (0.237). Known-group validity, assessed via the Mann-Whitney Conclusion: The culturally adapted Indonesian version of the KAST demonstrated robust psychometric properties, making it a reliable and valid instrument for assessing schizophrenia knowledge among family caregivers in Indonesia.

Indexed as

caregivercultural adaptationfamilyknowledgepsychometric evaluationscale validationschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID40800576
PMCPMC12341556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.