ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Perceptions of the Provision of Pain Care Services from the Perspective of People with Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pain is a common, debilitating, and complex non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD), often requiring input from healthcare providers across various disciplines for effective management. The aims of this study were to explore the perspectives of people with PD on the provision of pain care services. Methods: A qualitative descriptive research methodology employing a maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit people with PD, living in Australia. Data were collected using individual, semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically. To ensure trustworthiness, the study was conducted and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. Results: Eighteen participants (10 female), with a median age of 71 years (IQR 68-77), shared their perceptions of the provision of PD pain care services. Thematic analysis of interview data resulted in five themes: empathy and understanding (care); acknowledging needs and concerns (listening); explaining diagnoses and treatment options (explaining); expertise in PD (knowledge); and responding to needs with tailored solutions (individualization). Participants' experiences were influenced by the presence, or the lack thereof, of these elements during clinical encounters. Furthermore, participants noted that these features were expressed to varying extents by different types of healthcare providers (neurologists, general practitioners, allied health professionals, and PD nurse specialists), which led to differing perceptions of the quality of pain care services. Conclusion: The findings show that perceptions of pain care are influenced by a healthcare provider's ability to address both the emotional and physical needs of PD patients. The variability observed in participants' experiences highlights the need to ensure that all healthcare providers involved in PD pain care are equipped to deliver empathetic, individualized, patient-centered care that addresses the complex and multifaceted needs of this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.