ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Does Patient Satisfaction with Primary and Emergency Care Influence Non-Urgent Emergency Department Utilization? A Path Analysis.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary Care Utilization and Prehospital Emergency Demand Among Patients with Multimorbidity in Spain.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To examine whether patient satisfaction mediates the relationship between primary care (PC) utilization and non-urgent emergency department (ED) use during weekday working hours. Methods: This observational study compared patient satisfaction levels using two validated tools: the EUROPEP (European Patients Evaluate General/Family Practice) scale for PC visits and the Brief Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction Scale (BEPSS) for ED visits. Data analysis was conducted using Jamovi software (version 2.6.26), employing structural equation modeling and correlation analysis. Results: A total of 293 non-urgent adult patients (61.4% female) were enrolled in the study through consecutive sampling at ED visits of a tertiary hospital in Istanbul. Visits solely for examination purposes constituted 43.7% of PC visits and 66.6% of ED visits. Patient satisfaction rates were 66.7% for PC and 75.0% for ED. Frequent users of non-urgent ED services were also more likely to utilize PC services (r = 0.394, p ≤ 0.001). A positive correlation was observed between satisfaction with previous PC and ED experiences (r = 0.399, p ≤ 0.001). However, higher satisfaction with either service was not associated with increased visit frequency (p > 0.05). Notably, frequency of PC visits mediated the relationship between older age and increased non-urgent ED use (β = 0.067, 95% CI [0.002, 0.029], p = 0.028), suggesting insufficient referrals from PC to ED. Conclusion: Non-urgent ED utilization during working hours is not driven by low PC satisfaction or high ED satisfaction. Improving satisfaction alone is insufficient without addressing overuse, maladaptive health-seeking behavior, and the structural need for standardized medical equipment and adequate human resources in family health centers-rather than relying solely on categorical group classifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.