Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800562›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Does Patient Satisfaction with Primary and Emergency Care Influence Non-Urgent Emergency Department Utilization? A Path Analysis.

İbrahim Sarbay, Melike Mercan Baspinar, Ezgi Erman, Bilge Cavdar, Ilayda Tamer, Ayla Muge Adiyaman, Kafkas Kosali, Muhammed Yasar Aksuz, Okcan Basat, Mustafa Calik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

İbrahim SarbayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8804-2501
Melike Mercan BaspinarDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3183-3438
Ezgi ErmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0000-0624-2009
Bilge CavdarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0000-6899-3545
Ilayda TamerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0007-5498-821X
Ayla Muge AdiyamanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0006-9879-1649
Kafkas KosaliDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0004-9834-6372
Muhammed Yasar AksuzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-3095-6701
Okcan BasatDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-5222-9136
Mustafa CalikDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3184-2943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To examine whether patient satisfaction mediates the relationship between primary care (PC) utilization and non-urgent emergency department (ED) use during weekday working hours. Methods: This observational study compared patient satisfaction levels using two validated tools: the EUROPEP (European Patients Evaluate General/Family Practice) scale for PC visits and the Brief Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction Scale (BEPSS) for ED visits. Data analysis was conducted using Jamovi software (version 2.6.26), employing structural equation modeling and correlation analysis. Results: A total of 293 non-urgent adult patients (61.4% female) were enrolled in the study through consecutive sampling at ED visits of a tertiary hospital in Istanbul. Visits solely for examination purposes constituted 43.7% of PC visits and 66.6% of ED visits. Patient satisfaction rates were 66.7% for PC and 75.0% for ED. Frequent users of non-urgent ED services were also more likely to utilize PC services (r = 0.394, p ≤ 0.001). A positive correlation was observed between satisfaction with previous PC and ED experiences (r = 0.399, p ≤ 0.001). However, higher satisfaction with either service was not associated with increased visit frequency (p > 0.05). Notably, frequency of PC visits mediated the relationship between older age and increased non-urgent ED use (β = 0.067, 95% CI [0.002, 0.029], p = 0.028), suggesting insufficient referrals from PC to ED. Conclusion: Non-urgent ED utilization during working hours is not driven by low PC satisfaction or high ED satisfaction. Improving satisfaction alone is insufficient without addressing overuse, maladaptive health-seeking behavior, and the structural need for standardized medical equipment and adequate human resources in family health centers-rather than relying solely on categorical group classifications.

Indexed as

emergency medical servicesnon-urgentpatient satisfactionprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID40800562
PMCPMC12339664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.