Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800527›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Balancing excitation and inhibition: The role of neural network dynamics in working memory gating.

Nadine Herzog, Elena Cesnaite, Paul Steinfath, Nikolai Kapralov, Sean J Fallon, Vadim Nikulin, Arno Villringer, Lieneke K Janssen, Annette Horstmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nadine HerzogDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Elena CesnaiteDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Paul SteinfathDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Nikolai KapralovDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Sean J FallonSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Vadim NikulinDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Arno VillringerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Lieneke K JanssenDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
Annette HorstmannDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive & Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the complex landscape of daily life, we continuously balance between maintaining focus despite distractions and flexibly updating focus when needed-a cognitive process governed by a mechanism known as working memory gating. While much research has focused on the neural locus of this mechanism, less is known about the underlying neural dynamics. Here we probe the role of network excitation/inhibition (E/I) dynamics in working memory gating. Utilizing resting-state electroencephalography, we extract two markers of network E/I dynamics: resting-state long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs)-indicative of "critically" balanced E/I dynamics, and the slope of the power spectral density (PSD)-indicative of E/I ratio, and relate them to performance on a working memory gating task, specifically probing distractor-resistant maintenance and flexible updating. Based on previous studies linking stronger LRTCs to enhanced adaptive cognition, we initially expected to observe a similar relation. We find the opposite pattern, however: stronger LRTCs (indicating a more "critical" E/I balance) predicted poorer performance in maintenance-related working memory processes. This challenges the assumption that "near-critical" system dynamics are generally beneficial for cognitive function. Additionally, a flatter PSD slope (indicating a higher E/I ratio) was associated with better maintenance-related performance, particularly in individuals with higher levels of blood phenylalanine and tyrosine (indicating greater central dopamine availability). Notably, both network measures affected performance in all but the updating condition, suggesting a nuanced role of cortical E/I dynamics in overarching maintenance-related working memory processes, distinct from the gating mechanism as such. Our results highlight the complex interplay of network dynamics and neurochemical environments in cognitive function, suggesting implications for targeted interventions in cognitive disorders.

Indexed as

1/f slopeblood amino acid ratiolong-range temporal correlationsnetwork excitation–inhibitionP300working memory gating

Identifiers

PMID40800527
PMCPMC12315747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.