ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Cueing memory reactivation during NREM sleep engenders long-term plasticity in both brain and behaviour.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reactivation during sleep segregates the neural representations of episodic memories.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Distributed and gradual microstructure changes are associated with the emergence of behavioural benefit from memory reactivation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory reactivation during Non-Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) sleep is important for memory consolidation but it remains unclear exactly how such activity promotes the development of a stable memory representation. We used Targeted Memory Reactivation (TMR) in combination with longitudinal structural and functional MRI to track the impact of reactivating memories in one night of sleep over the next 20 days. Our exploratory analysis showed that such cued reactivation leads to increased precuneus activation 24 h post-TMR. Furthermore, the behavioural impact of cueing, which only emerged 20 days later, was predicted by both functional and structural TMR related changes in the sensorimotor cortex. These preliminary findings demonstrate that TMR leads to neuroplasticity, starting as early as 24 h after the manipulation, and evolving over the next few weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.