ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Effects of the spatial resolution of the Virtual Epileptic Patient on the identification of epileptogenic networks.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-resolution Bayesian Virtual Epileptic Patient using neural field models.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Multitarget neurostimulation of the deep brain: clinical opportunities, challenges, and emerging technologies.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Medical Digital Twin: A Review on Technical Principles and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital twins play an increasing role in clinical decision making. This study evaluates a digital brain twin approach in presurgical evaluation, the Virtual Epileptic Patient (VEP), which estimates the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We built the personalized digital brain twins of 14 patients and a series of synthetic dataset by considering different spatial configurations of the epileptogenic and/or propagation zone networks (EZN and PZN, respectively). Brain source signals were simulated with a high spatial resolution neural field model (NFM) composed of 81942 nodes, embedding both long-range (between brain regions) and short-range (within brain regions) coupling. Brain signals were then projected to stereotactic electroencephalographic (SEEG) contacts with an accurate forward solution. An inversion procedure based on a low spatial resolution neural mass model (NMM) composed of 162 nodes was applied to estimate the excitability of each region in each simulation. The ensuing estimated EZN/PZN was compared to the simulated ground truth by means of classification metrics. Overall, we observed correct but degraded performance when using an NMM to estimate the EZN from data simulated with an NFM, which was significant for the simplest spatial configurations. We quantified the reduced performance and demonstrated that the oversimplification of the forward problem is its principal cause. We showed that the absence of local coupling in the NMM affects the inversion process by an overestimation of the excitability, representing a significant clinical impact when using this procedure in the context of presurgical planning. In conclusion, this study highlighted the importance to shift from an NMM towards a full NFM modeling approach for the estimation of EZN, with a particularly relevant need when considering the most complex clinical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.