Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800484›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Meta-modeling the effects of anodal left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory performance.

Miles Wischnewski, Taylor A Berger, Alexander Opitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Causal functional maps of brain rhythms in working memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miles WischnewskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Taylor A BergerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Alexander OpitzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of anodal prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on working memory. However, a large variability exists in the applied tDCS parameters and working memory outcome measures. Using a meta-modeling approach, we investigated the relationship between tDCS electric fields in the left prefrontal cortex and improvements in working memory performance. Using this approach, a vector of outcome measures is correlated with the tDCS-related electric fields across several studies. These performance-electric field correlations (PEC) are calculated for each spatial location of the grey matter. Extracting 354 data points from 67 studies, we compared the spatial maps of tDCS effects on I) working memory accuracy and speed (regardless of working memory type and time of assessment), II) verbal and visuospatial working memory (regardless of performance measurement and time of assessment), and III) performance during and after stimulation (regardless of performance measurement and working memory type). We found that accuracy improves when anodal tDCS is applied to inferior frontal regions (Brodmann area 47) while working memory speed benefits from stimulation to dorsolateral and anterior prefrontal areas (Brodmann areas 9/10). Furthermore, the beneficial effects of left prefrontal tDCS are exclusive to verbal working memory, with no improvements in visuospatial working memory. We also observed region-specific effects only for task performance during, but not after, stimulation. The results of this study elucidate the causal involvement of prefrontal regions in working memory and can help guide tDCS placement for therapeutic application in disorders that involve working memory deficits.

Indexed as

electric field modelingneuromodulationprefrontal cortextranscranial direct current stimulationworking memory

Identifiers

PMID40800484
PMCPMC12224430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.