ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Evidence for a sustained cerebrovascular response following motor practice.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor tasks have been extensively used to probe neuroplasticity and the changes in MRI signals are often associated with changes in performance. Changes in performance have been linked to alterations in resting-state fluctuations of BOLD signal after the end of the task. We hypothesize that motor learning will induce localized changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) sustained even after the execution of a motor learning task. We implemented a new motor task to probe neuroplasticity and mapped the associated cerebrovascular responses. Twenty healthy volunteers underwent two MRI sessions 1-week apart: a task session with a sequence learning task performed with a data glove and a control session. During each session, CBF and BOLD signals were acquired during the task and during two periods of rest, each lasting 8 min, before and after execution of the task. Evoked BOLD and CBF responses to the motor task were seen to decrease in a regionally specific manner as the task proceeded and performance accuracy improved. We observed a localized increase in resting CBF in the right extra-striate visual area that was sustained during the 8-min rest period after the completion of the motor learning task. CBF increase in the area was accompanied by a regional increase in local BOLD signal synchronization. Our observation suggests an important connection between neuroplastic changes induced by learning and sustained perfusion in the apparently resting brain followed task completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.