ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Towards a more robust non-invasive assessment of functional connectivity.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- sBOSC: A Method for Source-Level Identification of Neural Oscillations in Electromagnetic Brain Signals.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- pBOSC: A method for source-level identification of neural oscillations in electromagnetic brain signals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive evaluation of functional connectivity, based on source-reconstructedestimates of phase-difference-based metrics, is notoriously non-robust. This isdue to a combination of factors, ranging from a misspecification of seed regionsto suboptimal baseline assumptions, and residual signal leakage. In this work,we propose a new analysis scheme of source-level phase-difference-basedconnectivity, which is aimed at optimizing the detection of interacting brainregions. Our approach is based on the combined use of sensor subsampling anddual-source beamformer estimation of all-to-all connectivity on a prespecifieddipolar grid. First, a pairwise two-dipole model, to account for reciprocalleakage in the estimation of the localized signals, allows for a usableapproximation of the pairwise bias in connectivity due to residual leakage of"third party" noise. Secondly, using sensor array subsampling, therecreation of multiple connectivity maps using different subsets of sensorsallows for the identification of consistent spatially localized peaks in the6-dimensional connectivity maps, indicative of true brain region interactions.These steps are combined with the subtraction of null coherence estimates toobtain the final coherence maps. With extensive simulations, we compareddifferent analysis schemes for their detection rate of connected dipoles, as afunction of signal-to-noise ratio, phase difference, and connection strength. Wedemonstrate superiority of the proposed analysis scheme in comparison tosingle-dipole models, or an approach that discards the zero phase differencecomponent of the connectivity. We conclude that the proposed pipeline allows fora more robust identification of functional connectivity in experimental data,opening up new possibilities to study brain networks with mechanisticallyinspired connectivity measures in cognition and in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.