Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800442›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Optimising the sensitivity of optically-pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography to gamma band electrophysiological activity.

Ryan M Hill, Holly Schofield, Elena Boto, Lukas Rier, James Osborne, Cody Doyle, Frank Worcester, Tyler Hayward, Niall Holmes, Richard Bowtell and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ryan M HillSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Holly SchofieldSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Elena BotoSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Lukas RierSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
James OsborneQuSpin, Inc., Louisville, Colorado, United States.
Cody DoyleQuSpin, Inc., Louisville, Colorado, United States.
Frank WorcesterCerca Magnetics Limited, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tyler HaywardCerca Magnetics Limited, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Niall HolmesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Richard BowtellSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Vishal ShahQuSpin, Inc., Louisville, Colorado, United States.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

High-resolution Non-cryogenic Magnetoencephalography: Systems-Level IntegrationR44MH110288 · NIMH · QUSPIN · PI SHAH, VISHAL K · 2016 to 2022
$5.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH110288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of electrophysiology is of critical importance to our understanding of brain function. However, current non-invasive measurements-electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG)-have limited sensitivity, particularly compared to invasive recordings. Optically-Pumped Magnetometers (OPMs) are a new type of magnetic field sensor which ostensibly promise MEG systems with higher sensitivity; however, the noise floor of current OPMs remains high compared to cryogenic instrumentation and this limits the achievable signal-to-noise ratio of OPM-MEG recordings. Here, we investigate how sensor array design affects sensitivity, and whether judicious sensor placement could compensate for the higher noise floor. Through theoretical analyses, simulations, and experiments, we use a beamformer framework to show that increasing the total signal measured by an OPM array-either by increasing the number of sensors and channels, or by optimising the placement of those sensors-affords a linearly proportional increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) following beamformer reconstruction. Our experimental measurements confirm this finding, showing that by changing sensor locations in a 90-channel array, we could increase the SNR of visual gamma oscillations from 4.8 to 10.5. Using a 180-channel optimised OPM-array, we capture broadband gamma oscillations induced by a naturalistic visual paradigm, with an SNR of 3; a value that compares favourably to similar measures made using conventional MEG. Our findings show how an OPM-MEG array can be optimised to measure brain electrophysiology with the highest possible sensitivity. This is important for the design of future OPM-based instrumentation.

Indexed as

beamformermagnetoencephalographyMEGOPMoptically-pumped-magnetometersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID40800442
PMCPMC12247564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.