Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800425›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Rescuing missing data in connectome-based predictive modeling.

Qinghao Liang, Rongtao Jiang, Brendan D Adkinson, Matthew Rosenblatt, Saloni Mehta, Maya L Foster, Siyuan Dong, Chenyu You, Sahand Negahban, Harrison H Zhou and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qinghao LiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Rongtao JiangDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Brendan D AdkinsonInterdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Matthew RosenblattDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Saloni MehtaDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Maya L FosterDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Siyuan DongDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Chenyu YouDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Sahand NegahbanDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Harrison H ZhouDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Joseph ChangDepartment of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Dustin ScheinostDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests brain-phenotype predictions may require very large sample sizes. However, as the sample size increases, missing data also increase. Conventional methods, like complete-case analysis, discard useful information and shrink the sample size. To address the missing data problem, we investigated rescuing these missing data through imputation. Imputation is substituting estimated values for missing data to be used in downstream analyses. We integrated imputation methods into the Connectome-based Predictive Modeling (CPM) framework. Utilizing four open-source datasets-the Human Connectome Project, the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics, and the Healthy Brain Network (HBN)-we validated and compared our framework with different imputation methods against complete-case analysis for both missing connectomes and missing phenotypic measures scenarios. Imputing connectomes exhibited superior prediction performance on real and simulated missing data compared to complete-case analysis. In addition, we found that imputation accuracy was a good indicator for choosing an imputation method for missing phenotypic measures but not informative for missing connectomes. In a real-world example predicting cognition using the HBN, we rescued 628 individuals through imputation, doubling the complete case sample size and increasing the variance explained by the predicted value by 45%. In conclusion, our study is a benchmark for state-of-the-art imputation techniques when dealing with missing connectome and phenotypic data in predictive modeling scenarios. Our results suggest that improving prediction performance can be achieved by strategically addressing missing data through effective imputation methods rather than resorting to the outright exclusion of participants. Our results suggest that rescuing data with imputation, instead of discarding participants with missing information, improves prediction performance.

Indexed as

fMRIFunctional connectivityimputationmachine learningmissing data

Identifiers

PMID40800425
PMCPMC12224408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.