ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Multiple focal pulvinar projection fields in the macaque cortex.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulvinar subdivisions and connectivity patterns across primate species: a comparative perspective.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2026Review
- Frequency Coding of Multisensory Integration in the Local Field Potentials of the Medial Pulvinar.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- The macaque ventral intraparietal functional connectivity patterns reveal an anterio-posterior specialization mirroring that described in human ventral intraparietal area.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pulvinar, the largest nucleus of the thalamus, is functionally heterogeneous and involved in multiple cognitive functions. It has been proposed to act as a functional hub of cortical processes due to its extensive reciprocal connectivity with the cortex. However, its role in cognition is not fully understood yet. Here, we posit that an improved understanding of its functional connectivity with the cortex is needed to better capture the cognitive functions of this nucleus. To address this question, we characterize the pulvino-cortical functional connectivity along the ventro-dorsal, antero-posterior, and medio-lateral axes, using awake resting-state data from 10 adult macaques. We first report two global cortical functional connectivity gradients along the antero-posterior and ventro-dorsal pulvinar gradients that match remarkably well the structural connectivity gradients described by anatomical approaches. In addition to these global gradients, multiple local cortical pulvinar projection fields can be identified at the sulci level such as in the lateral sulcus (LS), the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), the principal sulci (PS), and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). For most sulci, we show that functional pulvino-cortical projection fields follow the major anatomical axis of these different sulci (e.g., the ventro-dorsal axis for the LS and the antero-posterior axis for the IPS). Other sulci, such as the superior temporal sulcus, the posterior cingulate cortex, or the central sulcus, display multiple projection fields from the pulvinar. Although substantial inter-individual differences exist, the general functional connectivity patterns are remarkably consistent across hemispheres and individuals. Overall, we propose that these multiple pulvinar projection fields correspond to a fundamental principle of pulvino-cortical connectivity and that a better understanding of this connectional organization will shed light on the function of pulvino-cortical interactions and the role of the pulvinar in cognition at large.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.