Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800377›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Cerebellar non-invasive stimulation of social and emotional mentalizing: A meta-analysis.

Frank Van Overwalle, Naem Haihambo, Qianying Ma, Meijia Li, Rocío Martínez-Regueiro, Ines Argoub, Mahyar Firouzi, Natacha Deroost, Chris Baeken, Kris Baetens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frank Van OverwalleFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Naem HaihamboFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Qianying MaLanguage Pathology and Brain Science MEG Lab, School of Communication Sciences, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.
Meijia LiFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Rocío Martínez-RegueiroFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ines ArgoubFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mahyar FirouziFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Natacha DeroostFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Chris BaekenFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Kris BaetensFaculty of Psychology and Center for Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present meta-analysis investigated the impact of non-invasive stimulation, using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) targeting the posterior cerebellum, on social and emotional mentalizing about others. Prior research has convincingly shown that the posterior cerebellum supports social and emotional cognition. We identified 14 studies targeting the cerebellum with appropriate control conditions (i.e., sham, control site), which exclude general learning effects of the task or placebo effects. The studies included 29 task conditions where stimulation before or during a social or emotional task was applied on healthy samples. The results showed significant evidence that sustained anodal tDCS and TMS generally improved social and emotional performance after stimulation, in comparison with sham or control conditions, with a small effect size. In contrast, cathodal stimulation showed mixed facilitatory and inhibitory results. In addition, short TMS pulses, administered with the aim of interfering with ongoing social or emotional processes, induced a small but consistent inhibitory effect. Control tasks without social or emotional components also showed significant improvement after sustained anodal tDCS and TMS, suggesting that transcranial stimulation of the cerebellum may also improve other functions. This was not the case for short TMS pulses, which did not modulate non-social and non-emotional control tasks. Taken together, this meta-analysis shows that cerebellar neurostimulation confirms a causal role of the cerebellum in socio-emotional cognition, has a small but significant effect on improving socio-emotional skills, and may, therefore, have important clinical applications in pathologies where social and emotional cognition is impaired.

Indexed as

emotionnon-invasive cerebellar stimulationsocial mentalizingsocial sequencingtDCStheory of mindTMS

Identifiers

PMID40800377
PMCPMC12290810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.