ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
The position of visual word forms in the anatomical and representational space of visual categories in occipitotemporal cortex.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating action topography in visual cortex and deep artificial neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Demystifying visual word form area visual and nonvisual response properties with precision fMRI.iScience · 2024Article
- Unique longitudinal contributions of sulcal interruptions to reading acquisition in children.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A 7T fMRI investigation of hand and tool areas in the lateral and ventral occipitotemporal cortex.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent reviews emphasized the need for investigating the complexity of multiplesubareas of word selectivity and how this relates to selectivity for othervisual categories, at the individual level at a high spatial resolution (withoutnormalization or smoothing). To investigate this, both on the brain surface andin the representational space of the occipitotemporal cortex, we presented 19participants with images of 20 different categories during 7T fMRI. Thesecategories included several word-like conditions, and in addition cover many ofthe dimensions that have been suggested to define object space, such as animacyand real-world size. In the left hemisphere, we found three subareas of thevisual word form area (VWFA) and one extra subarea around the pFusface-selective area. We also observed several areas of selectivity to hands thatcould consistently guide the localization of word and face areas. No clearpredictive anatomical landmarks were found. Results of the right hemisphere wereless clear, in part due to weaker word selectivity. In the representationalspace, word selectivity stood out from other categories. It had multipleneighboring categories at a similar distance (e.g., faces, bodies, hands, cars),so no special relationship was found with, for example, faces. These resultsenable a consistent and reliable way to locate subareas of word selectivity andmay inspire future research into words in the representational space of theoccipitotemporal cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.