ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Disentangling the neural correlates of semantic and domain-general control: The roles of stimulus domain and task process.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Mechanisms of Bidirectional Visuo-Linguistic Transformation in Interactive Communication.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- The Neural Processes Underpinning Flexible Semantic Retrieval in Visual and Auditory Modalities.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Semantic control across Alzheimer's disease phenotypes: cognitive mechanisms and neural correlates.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Beyond behavior: a neurocognitive agenda for investigating the neural underpinnings of successful high-technology augmentative and alternative communication in adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural signatures and personalized neuromodulation in a subject experiencing context-dependent inhibitory control deficits.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- The inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus: bridging phylogeny, ontogeny and functional anatomy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Syntactic processing engages the semantic control network.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Control processes are critical for the context-appropriate use of meaningful stimuli. Similar definitions have been adopted in two distinct literatures focusing on identifying the neural correlates of "semantic control" and of executive control across domains (the "multiple demand network"). Surprisingly, despite their proposed functions varying only in relation to domain-specificity, these networks appear to differ anatomically. However, prior comparisons are confounded by variations in task design. To what extent might varying task requirements drive differences in activation patterns that are typically attributed to stimulus domain? Here, for the first time, we use functional MRI to disentangle the effects of task process and stimulus domain during cognitively demanding tasks. Participants performed an odd-one-out task requiring rule-switching, inhibition and selection processes, and an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.