ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Simultaneous whole-head electrophysiological recordings using EEG and OPM-MEG.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying cerebellar signal detectability in MEG and EEG in epilepsy using anatomically informed source modeling.NeuroImage · 2026Article
- Optically pumped magnetometers enhance neuroimaging performance-An EEG, OPM, and SQUID-MEG study.iScience · 2026Article
- Optimizing OPM-MEG Sensor Layouts Using the Sequential Selection Algorithm with Simulated Sources and Individual Anatomy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantifying Cerebellar Signal Detectability in MEG and EEG in Epilepsy Using Anatomically Informed Source Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Electrostatically actuated MEMS resonators for magnetic and electric field sensing: a review.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Expanding the toolkit: OPMs for studying the developing brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Review
- SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Review
- Anatomically Veridical On-Scalp Sensor Topographies.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Demonstrating equivalence across magnetoencephalography scanner platforms using neural fingerprinting.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Towards a 384-channel magnetoencephalography system based on optically pumped magnetometers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The development of aperiodic and periodic resting-state power between early childhood and adulthood: New insights from optically pumped magnetometers.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- A novel, robust, and portable platform for magnetoencephalography using optically-pumped magnetometers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- A Novel, Robust, and Portable Platform for Magnetoencephalography using Optically Pumped Magnetometers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) non-invasively measure human brain electrophysiology. They differ in nature; MEG offers better performance while EEG (a wearable platform) is more practical. They are also complementary, with studies showing that concurrent MEG/EEG provides advantages over either modality alone, and consequently clinical guidelines for MEG in epilepsy recommend simultaneous acquisition of MEG and EEG. In recent years, new instrumentation-the optically pumped magnetometer (OPM)-has had a significant impact on MEG, offering improved performance, lifespan compliance, and wearable MEG systems. Nevertheless, the ability to carry out simultaneous EEG/OPM-MEG remains critical. Here, we investigated whether simultaneous, wearable, whole-head EEG and OPM-MEG measurably degrades signal quality in either modality. We employed two tasks: a motor task known to modulate beta oscillations, and an eyes-open/closed task known to modulate alpha oscillations. In both, we characterised the performance of EEG alone, OPM-MEG alone, and concurrent EEG/OPM-MEG. Results show that the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the beta response was similar, regardless of whether modalities were used individually or concurrently. Likewise, our alpha band recordings demonstrated that signal contrast was stable, regardless of the concurrent recording. We also demonstrate significant advantages of OPM-MEG; specifically, the OPM-MEG signal is less correlated across channels and less susceptible to interference from non-brain sources. Our results suggest that there are no barriers to simultaneous wearable EEG/OPM-MEG, and consequently this technique is ripe for neuroscientific and clinical adoption. This will be important in the clinic where simultaneous EEG and OPM-MEG recordings will facilitate better interpretation of OPM-MEG data in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.