ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Multilayer meta-matching: Translating phenotypic prediction models from multiple datasets to small data.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Robust Longitudinal Dementia Prediction under Systemic Missingness via Hierarchical Fusion and Test-Time Adaptation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Functional Coupling and Longitudinal Outcome Prediction in First-Episode Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025Article
- Mind the Gap: Does Brain Age Improve Alzheimer's Disease Prediction?Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Cross-Dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Benchmarking the AI-based diagnostic potential of plasma proteomics for neurodegenerative disease in 17,170 people.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Longer scans boost prediction and cut costs in brain-wide association studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Generalizable and replicable brain-based predictions of cognitive functioning across common psychiatric illness.Science advances · 2024Article
- DeepResBat: deep residual batch harmonization accounting for covariate distribution differences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Translating phenotypic prediction models from big to small anatomical MRI data using meta-matching.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) is widely used to predict phenotypic traits in individuals. Large sample sizes can significantly improve prediction accuracies. However, for studies of certain clinical populations or focused neuroscience inquiries, small-scale datasets often remain a necessity. We have previously proposed a "meta-matching" approach to translate prediction models from large datasets to predict new phenotypes in small datasets. We demonstrated a large improvement over classical kernel ridge regression (KRR) when translating models from a single source dataset (UK Biobank) to the Human Connectome Project Young Adults (HCP-YA) dataset. In the current study, we propose two meta-matching variants ("meta-matching with dataset stacking" and "multilayer meta-matching") to translate models from multiple source datasets across disparate sample sizes to predict new phenotypes in small target datasets. We evaluate both approaches by translating models trained from five source datasets (with sample sizes ranging from 862 participants to 36,834 participants) to predict phenotypes in the HCP-YA and HCP-Aging datasets. We find that multilayer meta-matching modestly outperforms meta-matching with dataset stacking. Both meta-matching variants perform better than the original "meta-matching with stacking" approach trained only on the UK Biobank. All meta-matching variants outperform classical KRR and transfer learning by a large margin. In fact, KRR is better than classical transfer learning when less than 50 participants are available for finetuning, suggesting the difficulty of classical transfer learning in the very small sample regime. The multilayer meta-matching model is publicly available athttps://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/Meta_matching_models/tree/main/rs-fMRI/v2.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.