Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800333›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Objective QC for diffusion MRI data: Artefact detection using normative modelling.

Ramona Cirstian, Natalie J Forde, Jesper L R Andersson, Stamatios N Sotiropoulos, Christian F Beckmann, Andre F Marquand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramona CirstianDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Natalie J FordeDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jesper L R AnderssonWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging - Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Stamatios N SotiropoulosWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging - Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christian F BeckmannDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Andre F MarquandDonders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diffusion MRI is a neuroimaging modality used to evaluate brain structure at a microscopic level and can be exploited to map white matter fibre bundles and microstructure in the brain. One common issue is the presence of artefacts, such as acquisition artefacts, physiological artefacts, distortions, or image processing-related artefacts. These may lead to problems with other downstream processes and can bias subsequent analyses. In this work, we use normative modelling to create a semi-automated pipeline for detecting diffusion imaging artefacts and errors by modelling 24 white matter imaging-derived phenotypes from the UK Biobank dataset. The considered features comprised four microstructural features (from models with different complexity such as fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from a diffusion tensor model and parameters from neurite orientation, dispersion, and density models), each within six pre-selected white matter tracts of various sizes and geometrical complexity (corpus callosum, bilateral corticospinal tract and uncinate fasciculus and fornix). Our method was compared to two traditional quality control approaches: a visual quality control protocol performed on 500 subjects and quantitative quality control using metrics derived from image pre-processing. The normative modelling framework proves to be comprehensive and efficient in detecting diffusion imaging artefacts arising from various sources (such as susceptibility induced distortions or motion), as well as outliers resulting from inaccurate processing (such as erroneous spatial registrations). This is an important contribution by virtue of this methods' ability to identify the two problem sources (i) image artefacts and (ii) processing errors, which subsequently allows for a better understanding of our data and informs on inclusion/exclusion criteria of participants.

Indexed as

artefactsdiffusion MRIEddy QCnormative modellingquality control

Identifiers

PMID40800333
PMCPMC12247611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.