ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Objective QC for diffusion MRI data: Artefact detection using normative modelling.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation affects white matter microstructure in preterm infants.Brain communications · 2026Trial
- What needs to be standardized for reliable, reproducible, and robust tractography?GigaScience · 2026Review
- Investigating dopaminergic abnormalities in schizophrenia and first-episode psychosis with normative modelling and multisite molecular neuroimaging.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Lifespan Normative Models of White Matter Fractional Anisotropy: Applications to Early Psychosis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Multimodal neuroimaging protocol to explore the neural mechanisms of Tiao Shen Li Yan acupuncture in post-stroke dysphagia: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion MRI is a neuroimaging modality used to evaluate brain structure at a microscopic level and can be exploited to map white matter fibre bundles and microstructure in the brain. One common issue is the presence of artefacts, such as acquisition artefacts, physiological artefacts, distortions, or image processing-related artefacts. These may lead to problems with other downstream processes and can bias subsequent analyses. In this work, we use normative modelling to create a semi-automated pipeline for detecting diffusion imaging artefacts and errors by modelling 24 white matter imaging-derived phenotypes from the UK Biobank dataset. The considered features comprised four microstructural features (from models with different complexity such as fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity from a diffusion tensor model and parameters from neurite orientation, dispersion, and density models), each within six pre-selected white matter tracts of various sizes and geometrical complexity (corpus callosum, bilateral corticospinal tract and uncinate fasciculus and fornix). Our method was compared to two traditional quality control approaches: a visual quality control protocol performed on 500 subjects and quantitative quality control using metrics derived from image pre-processing. The normative modelling framework proves to be comprehensive and efficient in detecting diffusion imaging artefacts arising from various sources (such as susceptibility induced distortions or motion), as well as outliers resulting from inaccurate processing (such as erroneous spatial registrations). This is an important contribution by virtue of this methods' ability to identify the two problem sources (i) image artefacts and (ii) processing errors, which subsequently allows for a better understanding of our data and informs on inclusion/exclusion criteria of participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.