ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Time-varying functional connectivity as Wishart processes.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robust Inference of Dynamic Covariance Using Wishart Processes and Sequential Monte Carlo.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate the utility of Wishart processes (WPs) for estimating time-varying functional connectivity (TVFC), which is a measure of changes in functional coupling as the correlation between brain region activity in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The WP is a stochastic process on covariance matrices that can model dynamic covariances between time series, which makes it a natural fit to this task. Recent advances in scalable approximate inference techniques and the availability of robust open-source libraries have rendered the WP practically viable for fMRI applications. We introduce a comprehensive benchmarking framework to assess WP performance compared with a selection of established TVFC estimation methods. The framework comprises simulations with specified ground-truth covariance structures, a subject phenotype prediction task, a test-retest study, a brain state analysis, an external stimulus prediction task, and a novel data-driven imputation benchmark. The WP performed competitively across all the benchmarks. It outperformed a sliding window (SW) approach with adaptive cross-validated window lengths and a dynamic conditional correlation (DCC)-multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (MGARCH) baseline on the external stimulus prediction task, while being less prone to false positives in the TVFC null models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.