ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Cross-modal decoding of emotional expressions in fMRI-Cross-session and cross-sample replication.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic fMRI networks of human emotion.eLife · 2026Article
- Translational pathways of oxytocin therapy in schizophrenia: bridging negative symptom domains and neural mechanisms.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Dynamic Neural Deactivation Bridges Direct and Competitive Inhibition Processes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Neural network dynamics underlying the bottom-up perception and top-down regulation processes of empathy.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The theory of embodied simulation suggests a common neuronal representation for action and perception in mirror neurons (MN) that allows an automatic understanding of another person's mental state. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data enables a joint investigation of the MN properties cross-modality and action specificity with high spatial sensitivity. In repeated-measures and independent samples, we measured BOLD-fMRI activation during a social-cognitive paradigm, which included the imitation, execution, and observation of a facial expression of fear or anger. Using support vector machines in a region of interest and a searchlight-based within-subject approach, we classified the emotional content first within modalities and subsequently across modalities. Of main interest were regions of the MN and the emotional face processing system. A two-step permutation scheme served to evaluate significance of classification accuracies. Additionally, we analyzed cross-session and cross-sample replicability. Classification of emotional content was significantly above chance within-modality in the execution and imitation condition with replication across sessions and across samples, but not in the observation condition. Cross-modal classification was possible when trained on the execution condition and tested on the imitation condition with cross-session replication. The searchlight analysis revealed additional areas exhibiting action specificity and cross-modality, mainly in the prefrontal cortex. We demonstrate replicability of brain regions with action specific and cross-modal representations of fear and anger for execution and imitation. Since we could not find a shared neural representation of emotions within the observation modality, our results only partially lend support to the embodied simulation theory. We conclude that activation in MN regions is less robust and less clearly distinguishable during observation than motor tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.