ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Expectation Modifies the Representational Fidelity of Complex Visual Objects.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expectation Effects Based on Newly Learnt Object-Scene Associations Are Modulated by Spatial Frequency.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Limited Evidence for Probabilistic Cueing Effects on Grating-Evoked Event-Related Potentials and Orientation Decoding Performance.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Expectation dynamically modulates the representational time course of objects and locations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prediction has been shown to play a fundamental role in facilitating efficient perception of simple visual features such as orientation and motion, but it remains unclear whether expectations modulate neural representations of more complex stimuli. Here, we addressed this issue by characterising patterns of brain activity evoked by two-dimensional images of familiar, real-world objects which were either expected or unexpected based on a preceding cue. Participants (n = 30) viewed stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) streams which contained both high-fidelity and degraded (diffeomorphically warped) object images. Multivariate pattern analyses of electroencephalography (EEG) data were used to quantify and compare the degree of information represented in neural activity when stimuli were random (unpredictable), expected, or unexpected. Degraded images elicited reduced representational fidelity relative to high-fidelity images. However, degraded images were represented with improved fidelity when they were presented in expected relative to random sequence positions; and stimuli in unexpected sequence positions yielded reduced representational fidelity relative to random presentations. Most notably, neural responses to unexpected stimuli contained information pertaining to the expected (but not presented) stimulus. Debriefing at the conclusion of the experiment revealed that participants were not aware of the relationship between cue and target stimuli within the RSVP streams, suggesting that the differences in stimulus decoding between conditions arose in the absence of explicit predictive knowledge. Our findings extend fundamental understanding of how the brain detects and employs predictive relationships to modulate high-level visual perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.