Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800302›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Exploring an EM-algorithm for banded regression in computational neuroscience.

Søren A Fuglsang, Kristoffer H Madsen, Oula Puonti, Hartwig R Siebner, Jens Hjortkjær

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Søren A FuglsangDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristoffer H MadsenDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Oula PuontiDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hartwig R SiebnerDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens HjortkjærDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regression is a principal tool for relating brain responses to stimuli or tasks in computational neuroscience. This often involves fitting linear models with predictors that can be divided into groups, such as distinct stimulus feature subsets in encoding models or features of different neural response channels in decoding models. When fitting such models, it can be relevant to allow differential shrinkage of the different groups of regression weights. Here, we explore a framework that allows for straightforward definition and estimation of such models. We present an expectation-maximization algorithm for tuning hyperparameters that control shrinkage of groups of weights. We highlight properties, limitations, and potential use-cases of the model using simulated data. Next, we explore the model in the context of a BOLD fMRI encoding analysis and an EEG decoding analysis. Finally, we discuss cases where the model can be useful and scenarios where regularization procedures complicate model interpretation.

Indexed as

decodingEEGencodingfMRIregularization

Identifiers

PMID40800302
PMCPMC12247579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.