ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Population receptive field models capture the event-related magnetoencephalography response with millisecond resolution.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive mapping of the temporal processing hierarchy in the human visual cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Modeling neural contrast sensitivity functions in human visual cortex.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Much of the visual system is organized into visual field maps. In humans, this organization can be studied non-invasively by estimating the receptive fields of populations of neurons (population receptive fields; pRFs) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, fMRI cannot capture the temporal dynamics of visual processing that operate on a millisecond scale. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) does provide this temporal resolution but generally lacks the required spatial resolution. Here, we introduce a forward modeling approach that combines fMRI and MEG, enabling us to estimate pRFs with millisecond resolution. Using fMRI, we estimated the participant's pRFs using conventional pRF-modeling. We then combined the pRF models with a forward model that transforms the cortical responses to the MEG sensors. This enabled us to predict event-related field responses measured with MEG while the participants viewed brief (100 ms) contrast-defined bar and circle shapes. We computed the goodness of fit between the predicted and measured MEG responses across time using cross-validated variance explained. We found that the fMRI-estimated pRFs explained up to 91% of the variance in individual MEG sensor's responses. The variance explained varied over time and peaked between 75 ms to 250 ms after stimulus onset. Perturbing the pRF positions decreased the explained variance, suggesting that the pRFs were driving the MEG responses. In conclusion, pRF models can predict event-related MEG responses, enabling routine investigation of the spatiotemporal dynamics of human pRFs with millisecond resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.