ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
The temporal specificity of BOLD fMRI is systematically related to anatomical and vascular features of the human brain.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A large-scale heterogeneous 3D magnetic resonance brain imaging dataset for self-supervised learning.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Revisiting the auditory hemodynamic response function in the era of fast fMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A hypothalamic-brainstem activity sequence underlies arousal fluctuations during daytime drowsiness.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Biophysical simulations of fMRI responses using realistic microvascular models: Insights into distinct hemodynamics in humans and mice.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Functional MRI signals as fast as 1Hz are coupled to brain states and predict spontaneous neural activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Simultaneously determining regional heterogeneity and connection directionality from neural activity and symmetric connection.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- What are we missing? What are we assuming? The need to foster feature discovery tools to improve statistical models.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Short-term gradient imperfections in high-resolution EPI lead to Fuzzy Ripple artifacts.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Detectability and cortical depth dependence of stimulus-driven high-frequency BOLD oscillations in the human primary somatosensory and motor cortex.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Right Hemispheric Neuronal Dysfunction in Cancer Pain: A Resting-State fMRI Exploratory Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- Mesoscale Brain Mapping: Bridging Scales and Modalities in Neuroimaging - A Symposium Review.Neuroinformatics · 2024Review
- Fuzzy ripple artifact in high resolution fMRI: identification, cause, and mitigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to detect fast responses with functional MRI depends on the speed of hemodynamic responses to neural activity, because hemodynamic responses act as a temporal low-pass filter which blurs rapid changes. However, the shape and timing of hemodynamic responses are highly variable across the brain and across stimuli. This heterogeneity of responses implies that the temporal specificity of functional MRI (fMRI) signals, or the ability of fMRI to preserve fast information, could also vary substantially across the cortex. In this work we investigated how local differences in hemodynamic response timing affect the temporal specificity of fMRI. We used ultra-high-field (7T) fMRI at high spatiotemporal resolution, studying the primary visual cortex (V1) as a model area for investigation. We used visual stimuli oscillating at slow and fast frequencies to probe the temporal specificity of individual voxels. As expected, we identified substantial variability in temporal specificity, with some voxels preserving their responses to fast neural activity more effectively than others. We investigated which voxels had the highest temporal specificity, and tested whether voxel timing was related to anatomical and vascular features. We found that low temporal specificity is only weakly explained by the presence of large veins or cerebral cortical depth. Notably, however, temporal specificity depended strongly on a voxel's position along the anterior-posterior anatomical axis of V1, with voxels within the calcarine sulcus being capable of preserving close to 25% of their amplitude as the frequency of stimulation increased from 0.05 Hz to 0.20 Hz, and voxels nearest to the occipital pole preserving less than 18%. These results indicate that detection biases in high-resolution fMRI will depend on the anatomical and vascular features of the area being imaged, and that these biases will differ depending on the timing of the underlying neuronal activity. While we attribute this variance primarily to hemodynamic effects, neuronal non-linearities may also influence response timing. Importantly, this spatial heterogeneity of temporal specificity suggests that it could be exploited to achieve higher specificity in some locations, and that tailored data analysis strategies may help improve the detection and interpretation of fast fMRI responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.