ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Removing scanner effects with a multivariate latent approach: A RELIEF for the ABCD imaging data?
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scan site harmonization is a crucial part of any neuroimaging analysis when data have been pooled across different study sites. Zhang and colleagues recently introduced the multivariate harmonization method RELIEF (REmoval of Latent Inter-scanner Effects through Factorization), aiming to remove explicit and latent scan site effects. Their initial validation in an adult sample showed superior performance compared to established methods. We here sought to investigate utility of RELIEF in harmonizing data from the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, a widely used resource for developmental brain imaging. We benchmarked RELIEF against unharmonized, ComBat, and CovBat harmonized data and investigated the impact of manufacturer type, sample size, and a narrow sample age range on harmonization performance. We found that in cases where sites with sufficiently large samples were harmonized, RELIEF outperformed other techniques, yet in cases where sites with very small samples were included there was substantial performance variation unique to RELIEF. Our results therefore highlight the need for careful quality control when harmonizing data sets with imbalanced samples like the ABCD cohort. Our comment alongside shared scripts may provide guidance for other scholars wanting to integrate best practices in their ABCD related work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.