Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800272›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Optimization and validation of the DESIGNER preprocessing pipeline for clinical diffusion MRI in white matter aging.

Jenny Chen, Benjamin Ades-Aron, Hong-Hsi Lee, Subah Mehrin, Michelle Pang, Dmitry S Novikov, Jelle Veraart, Els Fieremans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Normal appearing white matter and disability in multiple sclerosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenny ChenCenter for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAIR), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Benjamin Ades-AronCenter for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAIR), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Hong-Hsi LeeAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States.
Subah MehrinCenter for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAIR), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Michelle PangJohn A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Dmitry S NovikovCenter for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAIR), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Jelle VeraartCenter for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAIR), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Els FieremansCenter for Biomedical Imaging (CBI), Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAIR), Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel K Sodickson · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Mesoscopic Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration with Diffusion MRIR01NS088040 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIEREMANS, ELS, NOVIKOV, DMITRY S · 2014 to 2023
$5.2M
Random Matrix Theory-Based Noise Removal in MRIR01EB027075 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIEREMANS, ELS, NOVIKOV, DMITRY S · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
Revealing tissue microstructure in the brain gray matter in Alzheimer's disease using in vivo high-gradient diffusion MRIDP5OD031854 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LEE, HONG HSI · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027075NIH HHS DP5 OD031854NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various diffusion MRI (dMRI) preprocessing pipelines are currently available to yield more accurate diffusion parameters. Here, we evaluated accuracy and robustness of the optimized Diffusion parameter EStImation with Gibbs and NoisE Removal (DESIGNER) pipeline in a large clinical dMRI dataset and using ground-truth phantoms. DESIGNER, a preprocessing pipeline targeting various imaging artifacts in diffusion MRI data, has been modified to improve denoising and target Gibbs ringing for partial Fourier acquisitions. We compared the revised DESIGNER (Dv2) (including denoising, Gibbs removal, correction for motion, echo planar imaging (EPI) distortion, and eddy currents) against the original DESIGNER (Dv1) pipeline, minimal preprocessing (including correction for motion, EPI distortion, and eddy currents only), and no preprocessing on a large clinical dMRI dataset of 524 control subjects with ages between 25 and 75 years old. We evaluated the effect of specific processing steps on age correlations in white matter with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) metrics. We also evaluated the added effect of minimal Gaussian smoothing to deal with noise and to reduce outliers in parameter maps compared to DESIGNER-v2's noise removal method. Moreover, Dv2's updated noise and Gibbs removal methods were assessed using a ground truth dMRI phantom to evaluate accuracy. Results show age correlations of DTI and DKI metrics in white matter were affected by the preprocessing pipeline, causing systematic differences in absolute parameter values and loss or gain of statistical significance. Both in clinical dMRI and ground-truth phantoms, Dv2 pipeline resulted in the smallest number of outlier voxels and improved accuracy in DTI and DKI metrics as noise was reduced and Gibbs removal was improved. Thus, DESIGNER-v2 provides more accurate and robust DTI and DKI parameter maps by targeting common artifacts present in dMRI data acquired in clinical settings, as compared to no preprocessing or minimal preprocessing.

Indexed as

diffusion MRIDKIDTIimage artifactpreprocessing

Identifiers

PMID40800272
PMCPMC12247605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.