ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
BNPower: a power calculation tool for data-driven network analysis for whole-brain connectome data.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tobacco Smoking Functional Networks: A Whole-Brain Connectome Analysis in 24 539 Individuals.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025Article
- Brain-wide functional connectome analysis of 40,000 individuals reveals brain networks that show aging effects in older adults.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Mapping neurodegeneration with diffusion MRI: biomarkers, mechanisms, and clinical translation.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Network analysis of whole-brain connectome data is widely employed to examine systematic changes in connections among brain areas caused by clinical and experimental conditions. In these analyses, the connectome data, represented as a matrix, are treated as outcomes, while the subject conditions serve as predictors. The objective of network analysis is to identify connectome subnetworks whose edges are associated with the predictors. Data-driven network analysis is a powerful approach that automatically organizes individual predictor-related connections (edges) into subnetworks, rather than relying on pre-specified subnetworks, thereby enabling network-level inference. However, power calculation for data-driven network analysis presents a challenge due to the data-driven nature of subnetwork identification, where nodes, edges, and model parameters cannot be pre-specified before the analysis. Additionally, data-driven network analysis involves multivariate edge variables and may entail multiple subnetworks, necessitating the correction for multiple testing (e.g., family-wise error rate (FWER) control). To address this issue, we developed BNPower, a user-friendly power calculation tool for data-driven network analysis. BNPower utilizes simulation analysis, taking into account the complexity of the data-driven network analysis model. We have implemented efficient computational strategies to facilitate data-driven network analysis, including subnetwork extraction and permutation tests for controlling FWER, while maintaining low computational costs. The toolkit, which includes a graphical user interface and source codes, is publicly available at the following GitHub repository: https://github.com/bichuan0419/brain_connectome_power_tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.