ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
The dynamics of dynamic time warping in fMRI data: A method to capture inter-network stretching and shrinking via warp elasticity.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional inertia reveals history-dependent organization of large-scale brain dynamics.Research square · 2026Article
- Aberrant recovery of timescale-aligned amplitude balance links to symptoms and cognition in schizophrenia.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Lag-adjusted functional network connectivity reveals sensorimotor and higher cognitive network alterations in depression.Research square · 2026Article
- Unsupervised Dynamic Time Warping Clustering for Robust Functional Network Identification in fNIRS Motor Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Aberrant Recovery of Timescale-Aligned Amplitude Balance Links to Symptoms and Cognition in Schizophrenia.Research square · 2026Article
- Functional Inertia Index of Memory-Retaining Brain Dynamics: A Measure of Large-Scale Brain Adaptability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Studying Time-Resolved Functional Connectivity via Communication Theory: On the Complementary Nature of Phase Synchronization and Sliding Window Pearson Correlation.Brain connectivity · 2025Article
- Neural flexibility in metabolic demand dynamics reveals sex-specific differences and supports cognition in late childhood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Timescale-normalized fMRI reveals disrupted dynamic signal-energy balance in schizophrenia.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- COMPLEX-VALUED PHASE SYNCHRONY REVEALS DIRECTIONAL COUPLING IN FMRI AND TRACKS MEDICATION EFFECTS.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Multimodal data fusion in neuroscience: promises, challenges and future directions.IEEE signal processing magazine · 2025Article
- Studying time-resolved functional connectivity via communication theory: on the complementary nature of phase synchronization and sliding window Pearson correlation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In neuroimaging research, understanding the intricate dynamics of brain networks over time is paramount for unraveling the complexities of brain function. One approach commonly used to explore the dynamic nature of brain networks is functional connectivity analysis. However, while functional connectivity offers valuable insights, it fails to consider the diverse timescales of coupling between different brain regions. This gap in understanding leaves a significant aspect of brain dynamics unexplored in neuroimaging research. We propose an innovative approach that delves into the dynamic coupling/connectivity timescales of brain regions relative to one another, focusing on how brain region couplings stretch or shrink over time, rather than relying solely on functional connectivity measures. Our method introduces a novel metric called "warping elasticity," which utilizes dynamic time warping (DTW) to capture the temporal nuances of connectivity. Unlike traditional methods, our approach allows for (potentially nonlinear) dynamic compression and expansion of the time series, offering a more intricate understanding of how coupling between brain regions evolves. Through the adaptive windows employed by the DTW method, we can effectively capture transient couplings within varying connectivity timescales of brain network pairs. In extensive evaluations, our method exhibits high replicability across subjects and diverse datasets, showcasing robustness against noise. More importantly, it uncovers statistically significant distinctions between healthy control (HC) and schizophrenia (SZ) groups through the identification of warp elasticity states. These states are cluster centroids, representing the warp elasticity across subjects and time, offering a novel perspective on the dynamic nature of brain connectivity, distinct from conventional metrics focused solely on functional connectivity. For instance, controls spend more time in a warp elasticity state characterized by timescale stretching of the visual domain relative to other domains, suggesting disruptions in the visual cortex. Conversely, patients show increased time spent in a warp elasticity state with stretching timescales in higher cognitive areas relative to sensory regions, indicative of prolonged cognitive processing of sensory input. Overall, our approach presents a promising avenue for investigating the temporal dynamics of brain network interactions in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. By focusing on the elasticity of connectivity timescales, rather than adhering to functional connectivity metrics, we pave the way for a deeper understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders in neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.