Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800254›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Trial-by-trial detection of cognitive events in neural time-series.

Gabriel Weindel, Leendert van Maanen, Jelmer P Borst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Joint models reveal human subcortical underpinnings of choice and learning behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel WeindelDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Leendert van MaanenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelmer P BorstUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the time-course of neural events that make up cognitive processing is crucial to understand the relationship between brain and behavior. To this aim, we formulated a method to discover a trial-wise sequence of events in multivariate neural signals such as electro- or magneto-encephalograpic (E/MEG) recordings. This sequence of events is assumed to be represented by multivariate patterns in neural time-series, with the by-trial inter-event intervals following probability distributions. By estimating event-specific multivariate patterns, and between-event time interval distributions, the method allows to recover the by-trial location of brain responses. We demonstrate the properties and robustness of this hidden multivariate pattern (HMP) method through simulations, including robustness to low signal-to-noise ratio, as typically observed in electro-encephalography (EEG) recordings. The applicability of HMP is illustrated using three previously published datasets. We show how HMP provides, for any experiment or condition, an estimate of the number of events, the sensors contributing to each event (e.g., EEG scalp topography), and the intervals between each event. Traditional exploration of tasks' cognitive structures and electrophysiological analyses can thus be enhanced by HMP estimates.

Indexed as

electrophysiologymental chronometrymultivariate patternssingle-trial analysistemporal dynamicstime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID40800254
PMCPMC12315731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.