ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024
Trial-by-trial detection of cognitive events in neural time-series.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial-level sequence modeling reveals hidden dynamics of dual-task interference.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Joint models reveal human subcortical underpinnings of choice and learning behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measuring the time-course of neural events that make up cognitive processing is crucial to understand the relationship between brain and behavior. To this aim, we formulated a method to discover a trial-wise sequence of events in multivariate neural signals such as electro- or magneto-encephalograpic (E/MEG) recordings. This sequence of events is assumed to be represented by multivariate patterns in neural time-series, with the by-trial inter-event intervals following probability distributions. By estimating event-specific multivariate patterns, and between-event time interval distributions, the method allows to recover the by-trial location of brain responses. We demonstrate the properties and robustness of this hidden multivariate pattern (HMP) method through simulations, including robustness to low signal-to-noise ratio, as typically observed in electro-encephalography (EEG) recordings. The applicability of HMP is illustrated using three previously published datasets. We show how HMP provides, for any experiment or condition, an estimate of the number of events, the sensors contributing to each event (e.g., EEG scalp topography), and the intervals between each event. Traditional exploration of tasks' cognitive structures and electrophysiological analyses can thus be enhanced by HMP estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.