Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800172›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2025

Effect of perinatal sterile gloves on neonatal mortality: a post hoc analysis of a randomised clinical trial in Zambia.

Mingling Cui, Xinglin Chen, Xuejie Zhang, Yanyan Zhang, Yan Huang, Jiajuan Lin, Zuming Yang, Lirong Shen, Yuelan Ma

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01241318 (Impact of Chlorhexidine Cord Cleansing for Prevention of Neonatal Mortality in Zambia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01241318 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Impact of Chlorhexidine Cord Cleansing for Prevention of Neonatal Mortality in Zambia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled77,535ConditionsSepsisArmsChlorhexidine gluconate (4%), Dry cord care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mingling Cui *Department of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Xinglin Chen *Academic Department, Chinese National Academy of Folk Art, Beijing, China.
Xuejie ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yanyan ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Jiajuan LinDepartment of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Zuming YangDepartment of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Lirong Shen *Department of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.
Yuelan Ma *Department of Neonatology, the Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sterile gloves, an inexpensive method of hand hygiene, are attributed both protective and useless characteristics concerning neonatal mortality. This study aimed to perform a post hoc secondary analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial (cRCT) to examine the association between intrapartum sterile gloves and neonatal mortality. Methods: Data from the Zambia Chlorhexidine Application Trial, a cRCT of 4% chlorhexidine umbilical cord care in Zambia from 2011-2013, were analyzed. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) (NCT01241318) provided pregnant women with clean delivery kits containing sterile gloves. Neonatal mortality was compared between the glove use and nonuse groups. Group differences were evaluated and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Sterile gloves were used in 96.9% of the 37,003 newborns, which varied significantly by place of delivery. The 28-day mortality rates for hospital, health center and nonfacility deliveries were 2.7%, 1.1% and 1.3%, respectively (P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, logistic regression revealed that the use of sterile gloves was associated with a lower risk of neonatal mortality [odds ratio (OR) =0.10; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.15]. The use of perinatal sterile gloves was associated with a reduced risk of immediate neonatal death (<24 hours) (OR =0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.91) and early neonatal death (1-6 days) (OR =0.26; 95% CI: 0.16-0.39). Conclusions: The use of perinatal sterile gloves may significantly improve neonatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The provision of sterile gloves to promote newborn health may be feasible in LMICs.

Indexed as

clean delivery kits (CDKs)low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)neonatal mortalitySterile gloves

Identifiers

PMID40800172
PMCPMC12336918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.