ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025
Medical technologists' experiences handling medical specimens during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) was highly infectious and had a high mortality rate. Globally, countries prioritised early disease detection through biological sample collection, analysis, and treatment. Understanding the physical and mental health outcomes that medical technologists experienced as a result of the increased risk of exposure is critical for making recommendations for the successful implementation of new workplace safety standards. Aim: This study attempts to provide a better understanding of medical technologists' experiences and occupational exposure during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. Setting: The study was carried out at a Gauteng public laboratory that is a component of South Africa's national health laboratory services. Methods: The study design was qualitative, exploratory, descriptive and contextual. Ten medical technologists were chosen using a purposive sampling technique. The data were gathered via in-depth, semi-structured interviews, which were audio recorded, professionally transcribed and coded. Tesch's thematic coding method was used to perform a descriptive analysis. Results: Three key themes were identified: health and safety, negative experiences, and positive self-satisfaction. Medical technologists were concerned about their safety and health while handling COVID-19 specimens because of the challenging work environment caused by the pandemic. This resulted in negative experiences, including stress and anxiety. Despite this, several individuals felt their contributions throughout the pandemic were notable. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic required additional resources, expertise, and training for medical technologists to safely collect and analyse biological samples. Contribution: The study's findings present an opportunity to develop work-related risk management and support plans for future pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.