ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Diagnostic value of prenatal ultrasound in the typing of fetal esophageal atresia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Respiratory Morbidity After Repair of Type C Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula: A Pediatric Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the prenatal ultrasound image features and diagnostic value of fetal esophageal atresia (EA). Methods: The clinical and prenatal ultrasound data of 24 fetuses with suspected esophageal atresia diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound and/or postpartum ultrasound at Shandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital between February 2022 and November 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, and the prenatal ultrasound diagnostic characteristics of different types of esophageal atresia were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Twenty-four cases of esophageal atresia were detected by prenatal and/or postpartum ultrasound. Among the 11 patients who were lost to follow-up or with no clear diagnosis after birth, the confirmation rate with prenatal ultrasound was 92% (12) among the 13 cases with confirmation by postpartum surgery or anatomy, with a classification concordance rate of 77% (10/13). Two cases of type IIIA EA were misdiagnosed as type IIIB, and one case of type IIIB EA was missed. The proportion of other malformations was 77% (10/13), and the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 15% (2/13). Conclusion: Prenatal ultrasound can be used to diagnose and assess the classification and combined malformations of esophageal atresia effectively, providing an strong basis for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.