ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Long-term prognosis of urethral balloon dilation for urethral strictures: experience from a tertiary care center in China.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The treatment of urethral stricture, particularly long-segment urethral stricture, poses a significant challenge in urological reconstruction. High-pressure balloon dilation has gained widespread recognition as an effective and safe therapeutic option. However, studies on its long-term outcomes, especially for long-segment urethral stricture, remain scarce. This study aims to establish the clinical baseline efficacy and safety of urethral balloon dilation at a tertiary care center and to provide context through an exploratory comparison with a contemporaneous cohort treated with direct vision internal urethrotomy (DVIU)/dilation. Methods: There were 128 patients with urethral strictures who underwent endoluminal treatment at our center between November 2017 and September 2023. Of these 128 patients, 64 underwent balloon dilation and 64 underwent DVIU/dilation. Demographic and stricture characteristics data were collected. The endpoint was defined as the recurrence of strictures requiring intervention. The efficacy and safety of balloon dilation were analyzed, including outcomes by stricture length within the balloon dilation group. Comparative outcomes with the DVIU/dilation group were explored cautiously due to baseline differences. Results: The median follow-up duration was 26 months for the balloon dilation group and 43 months for the DVIU/dilation group. Patients in the balloon dilation group generally had more complex strictures. The overall 1-year success rate for balloon dilation was 70.1%. Within the balloon dilation group, the 1-year success rate for long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) was 70.0%, and for short-segment strictures (<2 cm) was 70.6%, indicating comparable performance across these lengths in this cohort. The overall incidence of complications in the balloon dilation group was 20.3%. The DVIU/dilation group had an overall 1-year success rate of 70.2%. An exploratory subgroup analysis comparing patients with long-segment strictures (≥2 cm) in both treatment arms showed a success rate for balloon dilation (70.0%) that was markedly superior to that for DVIU/dilation (36.4%) within this specific subgroup (P=0.03, hazard ratio =2.48). Conclusions: Balloon dilation represents an effective and safe method for the management of both short and long-segment urethral strictures. These findings establish a valuable clinical baseline for conventional balloon dilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.