ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2025
Association between body fat distribution and female stress urinary incontinence: a cross-sectional study with the NHANES 2011-2018.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Body Composition Modulates Risk for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women < 60.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The android to gynoid ratio (A/G ratio) reflects the distribution of abdominal fat relative to gluteofemoral fat and may affect stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by increasing pelvic floor load due to elevated intra-abdominal pressure. However, its direct relationship with SUI remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to explore whether a higher A/G ratio is linked to increased SUI prevalence in American women aged ≥20 years. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used data from 5,309 women aged ≥20 years in the 2011-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). The A/G ratio was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Weighted multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine the association between the A/G ratio and SUI in women. Subgroup analyses based on smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, vigorous physical activity, moderate physical activity, vaginal delivery, cesarean section, menopausal status, and body mass index (BMI) were conducted to assess effect modification. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were employed to analyze nonlinear relationships and predictive accuracy, respectively. Results: Among the 5,309 participants, 1,958 reported experiencing SUI. After adjusting for covariates, a higher A/G ratio was independently associated with increased SUI risk [odds ratio (OR) =3.640, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.150-6.162]. The number of vaginal deliveries, cesarean deliveries, and BMI subgroups may interact with the A/G ratio (P<0.05). In the smoking status subgroup, significant positive associations between the A/G ratio and SUI were observed in both never-smokers (OR =3.611, 95% CI: 1.739-7.497) and current-smokers (OR =4.720, 95% CI: 1.311-16.997), indicating that a higher A/G ratios correlates with increased SUI risk in these two subgroups. In the vigorous activity subgroup, a significant positive association between the A/G ratio and SUI prevalence in the on-vigorous activity group (OR =4.752, 95% CI: 2.386-9.506). RCS analysis showed a linear association between the A/G ratio and SUI (P for nonlinearity =0.25). ROC curve analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758 for the A/G ratio in predicting SUI. Conclusions: The A/G ratio is a risk factor for SUI in women aged ≥20 years, suggesting its potential utility in clinical risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.