ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
"I know I shouldn't but …" the inevitable tension of using workarounds to be a "good nurse".
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patients and staff perspectives on hospital ward strain and its impacts on patient care and the workforce: a mixed-methods systematic review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rules, policies, and technologies are increasingly introduced in healthcare to reduce complexity and iatrogenic harm. One example is the implementation of Electronic Medication Management Systems (EMMS) to minimise medication errors. However, in hospitals where nurses primarily administer medications, research shows that nurses often adopt "workarounds" to overcome barriers in medication administration. This study explored how nurses experienced and perceived the use of workarounds in their daily medication administration practices. Understanding these feelings is crucial, as they are linked to both patient safety and staff retention. Methods: This ethnographic study was conducted in six wards in two Australian hospitals across 91 shifts, 46 interviews, seven focus groups, and member-checking sessions with nurses and EMMS stakeholders ( Results: Nurses described positive, negative, ambivalent, and conflicting feelings about using workarounds. Some denied the use or tolerance of workarounds, despite them being routinely observed. Most reported a tension between the perceived necessity of workarounds, reluctance to deviate from policy, and the desire to be a good nurse. Workarounds were seen both as the trademark of an expert, mindful nurse and as deviations from the rules, unsafe for both patients and nurses. Discussion: This study demonstrates challenges to patient safety associated with the tension between the necessity of workarounds and the desire to adhere to policy. This can create stress and anxiety among nurses. They experience a tension at the intersection of the necessity of workarounds to deliver care, to be a good nurse, and the desire to adhere to policy. The associated stress and anxiety can lead to burnout, professional disengagement, and attrition. The study proposes solutions to manage challenges associated with workarounds. Conclusion: Workarounds are an inevitable aspect of healthcare delivery in response to standardisation. Negative perceptions of workarounds may inadvertently contribute to the very harm that standardisation seeks to prevent. A more open dialogue about their use is essential. Recognising their inevitability and equipping nurses to manage them constructively is key to reducing stress, preventing burnout, and enhancing patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.