Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800072›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Engaging community to co-design learning health systems: lessons from storytelling and Design Jam, a community case study from British Columbia, Canada.

Margaret Chen-Mei Lin, Krisztina Vasarhelyi, Karen Lok Yi Wong, Haruka Furuichi, Jim Mann, Annette Berndt, Kayoung Lee, Lori Benning, Lillian Hung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Margaret Chen-Mei LinSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Krisztina VasarhelyiStrategy Deployment, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Karen Lok Yi WongIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Haruka FuruichiSchool of Nursing, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Jim MannIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Annette BerndtIDEA Lab, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kayoung LeeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lori BenningStrategy Deployment, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lillian HungSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health and research systems produce vast amounts of data, yet only a fraction is used to improve healthcare delivery-especially for equity-deserving communities. In Canada, Learning Health Systems (LHS) are guided by the Quadruple Aim: improving population health, enhancing patient and provider experience, and reducing costs, with equity now recognized as a critical additional aim. As LHS evolve, advancing health equity has become a core driver, particularly in Canada. An equitable LHS prioritizes inclusion, accessibility, and co-creation, ensuring that historically marginalized communities are active partners in shaping healthcare solutions. Community engagement is foundational to LHS, where individuals, families, and communities collaborate with clinicians, researchers, and decision-makers to drive meaningful improvements. This community case study describes how a large health authority in British Columbia integrated design thinking and a participatory action research approach to co-develop a vision for a community-centered LHS. Fifty diverse partners participated, including individuals and families, clinicians, non-clinical health staff, health administrators, researchers, and students. The project team drew on a Canadian LHS framework, appreciative inquiry, and design thinking to guide engagement activities. Participants co-designed a vision for LHS, proposing actions across six key areas, including (1) Legal and Ethical, (2) Science and Research, (3) Data and Technology, (4) Policy, Process, and Resources, (5) Indigenous Leadership & Participation, (6) Social, Community, and Equity. Through the sessions, lived experiences helped surface barriers and community priorities. Storytelling and Design Jam methods were key tools for fostering meaningful engagement. We propose practical considerations (INSPIRE) that researchers and policymakers can apply to enhance participation, foster equity, and ensure that Learning Health Systems remain community-driven and responsive to diverse needs: Inclusion first, Nurture Trust, Show impact, Partner with lived experience experts, Institutionalize diverse engagement, Recognize ethical responsibilities, and Ensure sustainability. Future research should investigate how to overcome barriers to participation, embed participatory approaches, and consider design-thinking in health system transformation. By focusing on community engagement, this case study demonstrates how LHS can be co-developed as inclusive and equity-driven.

Indexed as

co-creationdesign thinkinghealth services planninglearning health systemsparticipatory action researchpatient and community engagementperson centered health system

Identifiers

PMID40800072
PMCPMC12339457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.