Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800065›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological methods2025

Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsy: Protocol for a clinic-based surgical technique.

Ilias Giannakodimos, Napoleon Moulavasilis, Aris Kaltsas, Dionysios Mitropoulos, Michael Chrisofos, Konstantinos Stravodimos, Evangelos Fragkiadis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ilias GiannakodimosThird Department of Urology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12462, Greece.
Napoleon MoulavasilisDepartment of Urology, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.
Aris KaltsasThird Department of Urology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12462, Greece.
Dionysios MitropoulosDepartment of Urology, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.
Michael ChrisofosThird Department of Urology, Attikon University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12462, Greece.
Konstantinos StravodimosDepartment of Urology, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.
Evangelos FragkiadisDepartment of Urology, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prostate biopsy is a crucial diagnostic tool for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Traditional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy methods are often associated with an increased infection risk of infection and limited accuracy, particularly when diagnosing anterior lesions of the prostate gland. Objective: This article presented a structured protocol for performing transperineal fusion magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound (MRI/US) prostate biopsy, highlighting its advantages over the TRUS approach. Our study included biopsy-naïve patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels or abnormal digital rectal examination findings, all of whom underwent pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI to guide targeted biopsies. The key objectives of this protocol were to improve the detection rates of csPCa, minimize infection risk, and standardize a transperineal technique that combines both systematic and targeted biopsies. In addition, we provided details on patient preparation, equipment requirements, procedural steps, and follow-up protocols to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. This protocol aims to serve as a guideline for institutions to adopt MRI/US fusion-guided transperineal biopsy, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. Conclusion: The transperineal fusion MRI/US biopsy protocol enhances diagnostic accuracy, particularly for anterior lesions, while reducing infections risks. Combining targeted and systematic biopsies improves detection rates of csPCa and offers a standardized, safe approach for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Diagnostic protocolFusion magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasoundInfection reductionProstate biopsyProstate cancerTransperineal approach

Identifiers

PMID40800065
PMCPMC12342347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.