Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800064›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological methods2025

Diagnosing myasthenia gravis versus congenital myasthenia gravis in British Shorthair cats: A case study.

Adriana Amfim, Maria Cartacuzencu

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adriana AmfimDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Spiru Haret University, Bucharest 030045, Romania.
Maria CartacuzencuVeterinaty Clinic, Basarabia, Bucharest 030045, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an acquired autoimmune disorder characterized by autoantibodies targeting the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscles. In contrast, congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMSs) represent a clinically diverse group of genetic disorders affecting the neuromuscular junctions, with early onset and autosomal recessive inheritance. CMSs are particularly prevalent in Devon Rex and Sphynx cats. The gold standard for diagnosing MG in cats involves detecting neuromuscular junction autoantibodies by measuring acetylcholine receptor autoantibodies using radioimmunoassay. For CMS, a definitive diagnosis requires the identification of a causative genetic mutation in addition to clinical signs of skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue. With the Sphynx and Devon Rex breeds, data collected have identified a candidate disease region on the feline C2 chromosome, discovered by employing a genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism-based homozygosity mapping strategy. Given that MG is an autoimmune condition, it is treated with steroids, immunosuppressive drugs, and sometimes a thymectomy (surgical removal of the thymus gland). CMS is a set of genetic conditions that do not respond to these treatments. Hence, accurate differential diagnosis is critical. Case presentation: Presented in this case study was a British Shorthair feline which was anamnetically, clinically, paraclinically, and pharmacologically assessed. Genetic testing revealed a positive result for the Conclusion: This case study clarified and added criteria to the differential diagnosis between MC and CMS, allowing for more accurate prognostic evaluations and appropriate treatment planning. It also underscores the importance of genetic testing in British Shorthair cats to differentiate between these conditions.

Indexed as

AutoimmuneBritish shorthairCOLQ geneCongenital myasthenia gravisDiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID40800064
PMCPMC12342395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.