ArticleNational science review2025
Pore science and engineering: a new era of porous materials.
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale spatiotemporal heterogeneity of zeolite-catalyzed methanol-to-hydrocarbons reaction.National science review · 2026Review
- Predicting Structure and Transport in Disordered Mesoporous Materials via Cooperative Phase Transitions.ACS materials Au · 2026Article
- The funding effectiveness in chemistry at the National Natural Science Foundation of China: research progress on the fundamentals and applications of zeolite materials.National science review · 2026Review
- Porosity in electrochemical energy storage materials for superior performance gaining: insight into property performance and looking ahead.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- Modeling of Heat Treatment Processes in a Vortex Layer of Dispersed Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The grand blueprint for porous materials.National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This perspective introduces a new discipline of pore science and engineering, calling for concerted efforts among researchers to propel porous materials into a new era of theory guide and molecular-level design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.