Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40800006›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025

Evaluating the accuracy of generative artificial intelligence models in dental age estimation based on the Demirjian's method.

Allan Abuabara, Thais Vilalba Paniagua Machado do Nascimento, Seandra Maria Trentini, Angela Mairane Costa Gonçalves, Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes-Oliveira, Isabela Ribeiro Madalena, Svenja Beisel-Memmert, Christian Kirschneck, Livia Azeredo Alves Antunes, Cristiano Miranda de Araujo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Allan AbuabaraPost-Graduation Program in Health and Environment, University from the Joinville Region - Univille, Joinville, Brazil.
Thais Vilalba Paniagua Machado do NascimentoSchool of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná - UTP, Curitiba, Brazil.
Seandra Maria TrentiniPost-Graduation Program in Health and Environment, University from the Joinville Region - Univille, Joinville, Brazil.
Angela Mairane Costa GonçalvesPost-Graduation Program in Health and Environment, University from the Joinville Region - Univille, Joinville, Brazil.
Maria Angélica Hueb de Menezes-OliveiraDepartment of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba - UNIUBE, Uberaba, Brazil.
Isabela Ribeiro MadalenaDepartment of Biomaterials, University of Uberaba - UNIUBE, Uberaba, Brazil.
Svenja Beisel-MemmertDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany.
Christian KirschneckDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany.
Livia Azeredo Alves AntunesPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Health Institute of Nova Friburgo, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cristiano Miranda de AraujoSchool of Dentistry, Tuiuti University of Paraná - UTP, Curitiba, Brazil.
Flares Baratto-FilhoPost-Graduation Program in Health and Environment, University from the Joinville Region - Univille, Joinville, Brazil.
Erika Calvano KüchlerDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Bonn, Medical Faculty, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dental age estimation plays a key role in forensic identification, clinical diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis in fields such as pediatric dentistry and orthodontics. Large language models (LLM) are increasingly being recognized for their potential applications in Dentistry. This study aimed to compare the performance of currently available generative artificial intelligence LLM technologies in estimating dental age using the Demirjian's scores. Methods: Panoramic radiographs were analyzed using Demirjian's method (1973), with each left permanent mandibular tooth classified from stage A to H. Untrained LLM, ChatGPT (GPT-4-turbo), Gemini 2.0 Flash, and DeepSeek-V3 were tasked with estimating dental age based on the patient's Demirjian score for each tooth. Due to the probabilistic nature of ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek, which can produce varying responses to the same question, three responses were collected per case per day (three different computers) from each model on three separate days. The age estimates obtained from LLM were compared to the individuals' chronological ages. Intra- and inter-examiner reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Coefficient of Determination ( Results: Thirty panoramic radiographs (40% female, 60% male; mean age 10.4 ± 2.32 years) were included. Both intra- and inter-examiner ICC values exceeded 0.85. ChatGPT and DeepSeek exhibited comparable but suboptimal performance, with higher errors (MAE: 1.98-2.05 years; RMSE: 2.33-2.35 years), negative Discussion: This study demonstrated that, although LLM like ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek can estimate dental age using Demirjian's scores, their performance remains inferior to the traditional method. Among them, DeepSeek-V3 showed the best results, but all models require task-specific training and validation before clinical application.

Indexed as

age determination by teethartificial intelligenceclinical decision-makingevidence-based dentistrygenerative artificial intelligencelarge language models

Identifiers

PMID40800006
PMCPMC12339434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.