ArticleInternational journal of food science2025
Harnessing Flowering Bund Plants Through Ecological Engineering to Improve Biological Control of Tungro Virus Vectors in Indonesian Rice Fields Agroecosystem.
Article in International journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological engineering (EE) has emerged as a promising strategy for managing insect pests in rice ecosystems by reducing dependency on chemical pesticides. However, the survival of parasitoids and predators in rice habitats is often limited due to a lack of refuge and food sources. While pesticides remain the primary method used by farmers to control green leafhoppers (GLHs), the main vectors of the tungro virus, their overuse poses serious risks to both environmental and human health. This study was aimed at evaluating the impact of EE on the population dynamics of GLHs and their natural enemies, the suppression of tungro virus infection, and the maintenance of rice yield. Field experiments were conducted in Sidrap, Indonesia, across three dry seasons (2016, 2017, and 2021) using three treatments: EE with biopesticide (T1), prophylactic insecticide use (T2), and untreated control (T3). The GLH population was significantly lower in T1 compared to T2 and T3, while natural enemy abundance (e.g., spiders, parasitoids, and predatory beetles) was highest in T1, particularly during later growth stages. Tungro incidence was lowest in T1, moderate in T2, and highest in T3, exceeding 13% in control plots. Despite differences in pest pressure and virus infection, rice yield did not differ significantly among treatments, with the highest yield (≈10-11 t/ha) recorded in 2021. These findings suggest that habitat manipulation through EE can suppress tungro vectors, enhance natural enemy populations, and sustain rice productivity without relying on chemical inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.